Most consultancies pair one senior with five juniors and call it a team. We built the opposite: a deliberately small bench of practitioners who have each spent a decade-plus on the platform, with a Certified Technical Architect reviewing everything that ships.
We compete on the second meeting — the one where you realise nobody on the call needs to "check with the architect" later.
The CTA is Salesforce's most rigorous certification — a board-graded architecture defense held by fewer than 300 practitioners worldwide.
I started VP Solutions after a decade of watching good Salesforce programmes fail for the same avoidable reasons — too many hands, too little ownership, and architecture decisions made by people who’d never have to defend them.
So the model here is simple. The person who scopes your work is the person who does it. Every engagement is reviewed by a Certified Technical Architect before it ships. We stay small on purpose, because the moment you scale on juniors, you’ve become the thing we left.
If you’re rebuilding a platform, launching a product on it, or trying to make AI mean something concrete inside your org — I’d like to talk.
These aren't values on a wall. They're the reasons clients come back, and the reasons we occasionally say no.
No bait-and-switch. The practitioner in the pitch is the practitioner on the build. Bench depth, not bench filler.
Not the ticket, not the hours — the result. We measure ourselves against the metric that mattered when you called us.
If AI won't move your number, or the build you want is the wrong build, you'll hear it in the first meeting, not the last.
Architecture you can defend two years later. We optimise for the org you'll still be running, not the demo you'll show next week.
A few sentences on your situation is enough to start a conversation.